<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ProPhotoHome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotohome.com/news/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news</link>
	<description>Camera News, Rumors, Articles, Videos and Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lens Calibrating A DSLR Is Easy and Fun by Debbie Serigne Perrin</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2009/10/lens-calibrating-a-dslr-is-easy-and-fun/#comment-11106</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Serigne Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=350#comment-11106</guid>
		<description>Interesting article about correcting front/back focus issues, but I can&#039;t seem to see the pictures you  posted to see your comparisons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article about correcting front/back focus issues, but I can&#8217;t seem to see the pictures you  posted to see your comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High ISO Comparison &#8211; Canon 1D Mark IV, Nikon D3s, Canon 7D, Nikon D300s by ugur</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/01/high-iso-comparison-canon-1d-mark-iv-nikon-d3s-canon-7d-nikon-d300s/#comment-10835</link>
		<dc:creator>ugur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=842#comment-10835</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I think there is a problem with the test results, because the exposure of the samples are not the same.
I downloaded the ISO 6400 and ISO12800 files, then I opened them with Photoshop cs5.1 with default settings. I didn’t change any settings in photoshop. I see that the files which is taken with 1D mk4 is underexposed approx 1 EV according to the nikon D3s files.
Especially, the shadow areas in nikon D3s file is well exposed so the noise level is much lower than the canon 1D, As a result the nikon D3s seems that it is the clear winner but it’s wrong. 
When I compare the photos according the color chart part  of the pictures, I saw that canon 1D is a little bit more grainy but sharper and d3s is little bit softer. I think If the same photo was taken with 0.5-1 EV higher exposure settings with canon 1D, The high iso results would be better than nikon d3s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I think there is a problem with the test results, because the exposure of the samples are not the same.<br />
I downloaded the ISO 6400 and ISO12800 files, then I opened them with Photoshop cs5.1 with default settings. I didn’t change any settings in photoshop. I see that the files which is taken with 1D mk4 is underexposed approx 1 EV according to the nikon D3s files.<br />
Especially, the shadow areas in nikon D3s file is well exposed so the noise level is much lower than the canon 1D, As a result the nikon D3s seems that it is the clear winner but it’s wrong.<br />
When I compare the photos according the color chart part  of the pictures, I saw that canon 1D is a little bit more grainy but sharper and d3s is little bit softer. I think If the same photo was taken with 0.5-1 EV higher exposure settings with canon 1D, The high iso results would be better than nikon d3s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clever Ingenious Hack Turns 35mm Canon AE-1 Into Digital Camera by Adina Hirschmann</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/04/clever-ingenious-hack-turns-35mm-canon-ae-1-into-digital-camera/#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>Adina Hirschmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=1300#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>The video was way too short &amp; had no details on how the camera was converted.  I just bought a Rebel 2000 for dirt cheap and want to do the same thing.  I&#039;m good woth tools, not afraid to dismantle if necessary and would appreciate a how-to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video was way too short &amp; had no details on how the camera was converted.  I just bought a Rebel 2000 for dirt cheap and want to do the same thing.  I&#8217;m good woth tools, not afraid to dismantle if necessary and would appreciate a how-to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 7D worse than Canon Rebel XSI? by maltwiz</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2009/11/canon-7d-worse-than-canon-rebel-xsi/#comment-10070</link>
		<dc:creator>maltwiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=507#comment-10070</guid>
		<description>just come across this - my first two 7Ds were returned because the IQ was atrocious and I persevered with my 3rd - that was a big mistake and I&#039;ve now binned it, given up on the benefits the APS-C gives for wildlife photography more than outweighed by the lousy IQ.  The 7D I&#039;m afraid is a poor camera and I know a number of photographers who feel the same</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just come across this &#8211; my first two 7Ds were returned because the IQ was atrocious and I persevered with my 3rd &#8211; that was a big mistake and I&#8217;ve now binned it, given up on the benefits the APS-C gives for wildlife photography more than outweighed by the lousy IQ.  The 7D I&#8217;m afraid is a poor camera and I know a number of photographers who feel the same</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Canon 7D Mark II by maltwiz</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2011/06/new-canon-7d-mark-ii/#comment-10069</link>
		<dc:creator>maltwiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=2354#comment-10069</guid>
		<description>God help us - the original 7D was a bit mushy with too many small pixels on the tiddly sensor, so this will probably be another canon QA nightmare</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God help us &#8211; the original 7D was a bit mushy with too many small pixels on the tiddly sensor, so this will probably be another canon QA nightmare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Autofocus Torture Test Updated (Canon 1D MKIV &amp; Nikon D3S added) by Ricelow</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/03/autofocus-torture-test-updated-canon-1d-mkiv-nikon-d3s-added/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricelow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=973#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>any chance of including Pentax K-5 and Nikon D7000?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any chance of including Pentax K-5 and Nikon D7000?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 1Ds MkIV With 32MP Sensor $7600.00 by Stephen Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/06/canon-1ds-mkiv-with-32mp-sensor-7600-00/#comment-10040</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=1489#comment-10040</guid>
		<description>I have 2 5Dmk2&#039;s and a 1Dmk4 ......   BRING ON THE HIGH RESOLUTION !!!     The more the better....   Seriously. I would shoot Medium Format if I had the money....    Cameras will improve with ISO ability every time a new one is developed... its just the way it is...      ALSO, for those hating on Canon Lenses....   I have all L Series lenses and they are sharp as hell...   Maybe your focusing is not very good?   :-)  

Im not sure if anyone knows or not but the 1Dmk4s has not been developed yet....   so this story is a bit silly......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 5Dmk2&#8242;s and a 1Dmk4 &#8230;&#8230;   BRING ON THE HIGH RESOLUTION !!!     The more the better&#8230;.   Seriously. I would shoot Medium Format if I had the money&#8230;.    Cameras will improve with ISO ability every time a new one is developed&#8230; its just the way it is&#8230;      ALSO, for those hating on Canon Lenses&#8230;.   I have all L Series lenses and they are sharp as hell&#8230;   Maybe your focusing is not very good?   <img src='http://www.prophotohome.com/news/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Im not sure if anyone knows or not but the 1Dmk4s has not been developed yet&#8230;.   so this story is a bit silly&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Said to Introduce New Pellix Cameras at Photokina 2010 by Jannich</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/06/sony-said-to-introduce-new-pellix-cameras-at-photokina-2010/#comment-9960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 16:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=1491#comment-9960</guid>
		<description>I  think that Sony needs to pull their act together, if they want  to keep  their  consumers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  think that Sony needs to pull their act together, if they want  to keep  their  consumers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 5D Mark III by Xaver</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/06/canon-5d-mark-iii/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>Xaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=1517#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>Guys, I like Marks post, because goes to the point, but you ALL who shoot digital sould sometimes think first and then write. There is some people who may know more than 01110001001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I like Marks post, because goes to the point, but you ALL who shoot digital sould sometimes think first and then write. There is some people who may know more than 01110001001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 5D Mark III by Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2010/06/canon-5d-mark-iii/#comment-9533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotohome.com/news/?p=1517#comment-9533</guid>
		<description>Wow, Aaron.... you can&#039;t honestly throw -down on a digital slr because you are pissed that you can&#039;t afford that high-end DSLR that look so damn pretty wrapped around our shoulders. Digital processing allows for infinite possibilities regarding pre- and post-processing, and cannot be simply seen as a cheater&#039;s version of whatever it is that YOU are shooting with. Shame on you. I am a student, and CAN play devil&#039;s advocate, and I know that there are pro&#039;s and con&#039;s for any  camera type- build or model, but what can you honestly base such a shallow argument upon? We ALL shoot digital...what&#039;s the problem???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Aaron&#8230;. you can&#8217;t honestly throw -down on a digital slr because you are pissed that you can&#8217;t afford that high-end DSLR that look so damn pretty wrapped around our shoulders. Digital processing allows for infinite possibilities regarding pre- and post-processing, and cannot be simply seen as a cheater&#8217;s version of whatever it is that YOU are shooting with. Shame on you. I am a student, and CAN play devil&#8217;s advocate, and I know that there are pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s for any  camera type- build or model, but what can you honestly base such a shallow argument upon? We ALL shoot digital&#8230;what&#8217;s the problem???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
