Pro Photo HOME
Go Back   Pro Photo HOME > Professional Digital Workflow Discussion > White Balance Tool Discussions
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered. Sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY. Free accounts provide basic access.

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Agree to receive admin email and abide by forum rules 

ColorRight

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools Search this Article Display Modes
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->'Tain't so, McGee<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
'Tain't so, McGee
Published by Doug_Kerr
04-15-2008
'Tain't so, McGee

Well, now that the Color Parrot has a spiffy new name (two of them, evidently) and a new site and an updated description page, I'm afraid I'm going to have to quarrel with some statements made on that page (I had hoped they would have evaporated in the renovation), to wit:

Quote:
One of the main problems with most existing white balance diffusers, is that they treat all light entering the lens the same. In other words, light at the edge of the frame is given a similar weight to light at the center of the frame.
I have no idea what that means. Are you referring to light striking the diffuser from different angles (which could also be described, for a limited range of angles, as "from different angles within the camera's field of view", which in a sense could be thought of as "the frame")?

In any case, I am not aware of any diffusers that are equally weighted across any substantial angular range. Several have essentially a "cosine" acceptance response, which is certainly not even approximately uniform.

I won't even bother asking why that is "a problem".

Quote:
Not only that, by using small pits in the surface, some products specifically attempt to mix all of the different light sources together so the camera will give an average reading for all of the light sources within 180 degrees.
Well, if you are describing the ExpoDisc, the "pits" (a pattern of little prisms) are intended to produce nearly a "cosine" acceptance response (which, as you know, is considered by some to be appropriate for incident light measurement for either exposure or white balance purposes). It does not give "an average of all the light sources over 180 degrees."
__________________
Best regards,

Doug

Visit The Pumpkin, a library of my technical writings:
http://doug.kerr.home.att.net/pumpkin

"Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #1  
By PB&J photography on 04-23-2008, 11:19 PM
Re: 'Tain't so, McGee

Treats all light the same.....

Other diffusers tend to "balance" or equal out this light. Meaning if you have a scene with bizzare mixed lighting (various light sources producing a number of color temps) you'll likely receive an average. Often this average doesn't look well. It may take only the prodominent light source into play and not the others, creating a less than flattering result.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Comment


Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.





ColorRight

Pro Photo Store

Professional Photo Resources Atlanta


Geo Visitors Map

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0