Pro Photo HOME
Go Back   Pro Photo HOME > Professional Digital Workflow Discussion > White Balance Tool Discussions
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered. Sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY. Free accounts provide basic access.

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Agree to receive admin email and abide by forum rules 

ColorRight

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools Search this Article Display Modes
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->Color Parrot - Central and annular acceptance<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Color Parrot - Central and annular acceptance
Published by Doug_Kerr
03-08-2008
Color Parrot - Central and annular acceptance

Don't get all excited now - "annular" isn't the opposite of "oral".

There has been interest expressed in the transmissive chromatic neutrality of the central portion of the Color Parrot (at the overlay "spot") compared to that of the annular region around the spot.

Why might this matter? Well, because it is likely that the light from the central portion of the diffuser plays a prominent role at the center of the sensor, where (in Canon EOS cameras, at least) the measurement of chromaticity for white balance reference purposes is made.

(Some seem to think that such a situation might also mean that the chromatic response of the diffuser varies with angle off axis. This is less likely, in my opinion.)

We recently made some simple tests to look into this. A Canon EOS 20D was used. Basically, after setting the white balance of the camera to suit the ambient light at a certain location (using CWB with a reference frame taken from a WhiBal gray card at that location), we then took (with the camera at that same location, exposed to that same ambient light) three frames with the Color Parrot in place, as follows:

1. With the entire Color Parrot face uncovered.

2. With all of the face outside the overlay spot covered.

3. With the overlay spot covered.

We then measured the chromaticity averaged over a small area in the center of the sensor frame (essentially emulating what the camera would do if regarding that frame for custom white balance purposes).

We then plotted those the chromaticities on the CIE u'v' plane, arbitrarily putting the chromaticity of the "full face" shot at the origin. Thus, we only look at the relative chromaticities for the three situations. (This simplified the test procedure, since we did not have to ascertain chromaticity on an absolute basis, or by reference to a "credible" reference device.

We see that chart here:



These results are very interesting. They suggest the following:

1. The basic "stack" of the Color Parrot has a substantial departure from neutrality.

2. The overlay disk beings the central portion closer to neutrality.

3. Evidently (for the particular lens situation tested), the light on the center of the sensor comes preponderantly from the central region of the diffuser (not too surprising). And a good thing that is - it makes the actual chromatic neutrality performance of the Color Parrot close to the rather good performance of the central region.

Again, note that, owing to the reading of the chromaticities on an integer RGB basis, the process is susceptible to an uncertainty on the order of 0.001 u'v' unit along either axis.

Note that we are still bereft of any explanation of the supposed role of the central overlay, but it does seem to provide a nice neutrality correction where it does the most good.

For reference, the lens situation for these tests (with the diffuser in place) was as follows:

- EF 24-105 mm f/4.0 IS at 24 mm
- f/4
- Focus at infinity

We recognize that a different result might well be attained for different combinations of lens parameters.
__________________
Best regards,

Doug

Visit The Pumpkin, a library of my technical writings:
http://doug.kerr.home.att.net/pumpkin

"Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #1  
By Doug_Kerr on 03-08-2008, 01:21 PM
Re: Color Parrot - Central and annular acceptance - updated chart

In the chart in my initial post in this thread, the measurements of the chromatic response of the Color Parrot with the entire face, only the central spot, and only the annular region around the spot in effect were taken with a source of incident lighting based on compact fluorescent lamps.

Their spectrum is a bit "spiky", and so metameric effects can intrude into the measurements (and as well intrude into the achievement of successful color balance - a growing problem to us in real practice!).

The consequence was that I declined to present the results on an "absolute neutrality" basis, rather showing only the differences in the two "partial face" responses compared to the "full face" response.

Today, I reran the test series using my favorite "daylight filtered through a white venetian blind" incident light source. I feel that this warrants presenting the data on as near to an "absolute" basis as I can muster (that is, taking the behavior of my WhiBal gray card as the reference).

Here is the chart on that basis. Also included now is the response of my ExpoDisc diffuser taken in the same series, and of course the reference, the WhiBal gray card (plotted by definition at 0.0).



Best regards,

Doug
Last edited by Doug_Kerr : 03-08-2008 at 01:27 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Comment


Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 PM.





ColorRight

Pro Photo Store

Professional Photo Resources Atlanta


Geo Visitors Map

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0