If they are just getting into it make sure they start out shooting Canon Raw and they will be happy with the skin tones and a much easier time too. I have had guys shoot for me with Nikon and the amount of post work involved to get a good image from raw was extreemely time consuming and never looked as good as from the Canon cameras. I would recomend 20D's or 1DII's for weddings, 1DsII for studio work.
I do agree with the above poster that a learning curve needs to take place between the person processing the files and the lab who prints. It's extreemely important that you use a lab that is dead on consistant like
www.Bayphoto.com who I use. The best skin I have seen and so consistant from the begining of the job to the end and several weeks later as well.
Also get them into good monitors and have them calibrate constantly. Good habits are very important, remember if you plant a potato most likely you'll get a potato.
As of late I have moved from a very accurate image to a more moody image. I have gone back to the art of directing the focus (I don't mean camera focus)of the image rather than counting eyelashes. I'm even darkening shadows for a more old hollywood look. Maybe it's a phase but I like it.
Phase one is a good choice or Bibble Pro for converting and don't count out DPP from Canon.