Pro Photo HOME
Go Back   Pro Photo HOME > Professional Photography Discussion > Wedding and Portrait
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered. Sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY. Free accounts provide basic access.

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Agree to receive admin email and abide by forum rules 
ColorRight

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #8  
Old 05-24-2004, 03:04 AM
Francis_Specker Francis_Specker is offline
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 275
Francis_Specker 10
Re: Best way to meter for white dresses with D1x

Digital camera don't have the dynamic range that color negative film has. Using direct on camera flash with a digital camera doesn't give you many options in capturing that range. Try using a softer light source, your flash way off camera held by an assistant, or maybe bounced of a ceiling if possible. I agree that shooting RAW maybe the best way to go but be prepared for a lot of post processing work.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2004, 03:25 PM
Vance_James
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Best way to meter for white dresses with D1x

You can keep your highlights with the histogram, midtones and shadows will fall to the side. Basically the skintones will look underexposed by up to 2 stops. The files from the D1x can handle this at moderate ISO's and no larger than 11x14 prints. That's my 2 1/2 years expirience with the camera. The only camera system that handles the white gowns is the Kodak system. The dynamic range is greater but the images are flat compared to other digital cameras. Since Kodak is designed for raw workflow, I can hear a lot of you cringe. I have had no problems with the past 45 or so weddings I've shot with my 760 and 14n, I'm looking for a 720 to go with these cameras. Raw in Kodak is not too much more time consuming than shooting finished files. I have to edit alls files shot, then convert to jpgs, I edit all files shot on the D1x, then renumber and print, the conversion is the only difference. I'm not knocking the D1x, the camera produces great images, just has a problem with whites from shiny fabrics. Since this is the only camera that interpolates in this way, I believe this to be why. A friend that shoots sports and I mean alot of, has the same situation with this, however his clients don't see it as a problem. Some brides also don't see it as a problem, some do! They paid a lot of money for the dress. I've seen blown wedding gowns with other cameras as well, but not to the extent of the D1x. The new S 3 will probably handle the dynamic range of weddings the best, if it does as promised. The best advice with the D1x is to shoot in flat lighting situations as much as you can, on camera flash will be the hardest to keep the gown from blowing out. When I shoot with on camera flash I use the diffuser bounced and set the SB 80DX to .7 to 1 stop under, can't do that in church with wedding party.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2004, 03:48 PM
David_Buzzard's Avatar
David_Buzzard David_Buzzard is offline
Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Whistler, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,691
David_Buzzard 10
Send a message via AIM to David_Buzzard
Re: Best way to meter for white dresses with D1x

Shoot RAW, and tone down the dress with some layer masking. That will give you a much wider dynamic range.

David Buzzard
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-24-2004, 03:58 PM
JP_Vellotti JP_Vellotti is offline
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 87
JP_Vellotti 10
Re: Best way to meter for white dresses with D1x

Thanks for the replies.

I do shoot RAW.

I find that I just have to be careful with shadows/brights shooting this camera like I do with slide film.

I've had no problems so far metering for the dress to pick up the details, just that the heads are a little underexposed, which come out fine in PS.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.




ColorRight

Pro Photo Store

Professional Photo Resources Atlanta






Geo Visitors Map

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0