|
|
|
Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
2
|
7393
|
Wed July 11, 2007
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
None indicated
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
Author
|
|
gavin_crawford
Premium Lifetime Member
Registered: August 2002
Location: Regina SK canada/Big White BC/Melbourne OZ
Posts: 849
|
|
Review Date: Tue June 5, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
better than the nikon12-24
|
|
Cons:
|
lens cap
|
|
I tried the nikon 12-24, then the Sigma 10-20 and took the Nikkor back.
The Sigma is sharp edge to edge (when used with a Digital, I no longer own film antiques) fast focusing, compact and well built. When compared to the 12-24 Nikon it wins hands down in the sharpness department, the nikon is just plain soft when compared to the Sigma.
Gav
|
|
|
|
knapsac6
Basic Member
Registered: February 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 11
|
|
Review Date: Wed July 11, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, low CA, quick focus
|
|
Cons:
|
front/rear lens caps, little heavy
|
|
I borrowed one of these from a buddy to use while out hiking in the Superstition Mountians. This lens was great for capturing scenic landscapes while I was out there, very sharp when used at 5.6, and had very little distortion when shooting at F4, 10mm.
The lens caps were junk though, but those can be easily replaced for a few extra bucks. Lens build felt great, aperature ring seemed to be a little stiff, but loosened up after continued use; it did start to get heavy after awhile, but maybe that is just a sign that I need to get into the gym.
All things considered, I really enjoyed using this lens and intend to get one for myself soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by: ReviewPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.
|
|
Advertise Here! - Contact Us!
|
|
