[ QUOTE ]
Thank you for posting this. I was looking at buying the 4000 to do the exact same thing, so I really appreciate your sharing your (disappointing) experience.
[/ QUOTE ]
This stuff makes me weary.
My studios use Canon S-9000, Canon 2200, Fuji 4500 pictography, Epson 9600 and Epson 4000.
The S-9000 will print a full page bleed quickly and beutifully, for a day, then the image changes drastically. With Canon paper it gains contrast by 25%, with other papers it developes a yellow cast.
The Canon 2200 has the most difficult interface in the world. It should be a great workgroup printer, but it is maddening to use and the default settins won't hold on batch printing.
The Fuji 4500 pictorgraphy will print a full page bleed (with a slight white line on the edge), but requires seperate carriers to change paper (about $600). Printing a few hundred images on the pictograph is expensive, BUT it is the most stable and IMO best photographic printer in the world. The images are stunning. If the price wasn't astronomical I would buy two more of these.
The only real issue is (other than cost) the Pictograph interfaces through SCSI and it is not clear if the next release of Mac osX will support SCSI.
The Epson 4000 is a beast and though fairly fast, the interface through Apple OSX requires a notepad to remember settings and this full page bleed issue is just false advertising. To add an exepsnive roll paper option, letter size becomes 8 1/4" and still not print bleed without scratching on the first 2" of a print makes you believe you have lost your mind, then you call Epson and they say, "yes this is normal" and you believe Epson has lost it's mind.
James Russell
www.russellrutherford.com