Pro Photo HOME
Go Back   Pro Photo HOME > Professional Photography Discussion- Full Access for Premium Members > Photojournalism

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
  2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1  
Old 08-31-2008, 08:41 AM
Ron Metz Ron Metz is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 198
Ron Metz 10
Is Print Dead?

Here is an interesting article. With many city newspapers now facing financial challenges, what is your opinion?

cbs2chicago.com - Mariotti Quits, Says Newspapers Are 'Dying'

  

__________________
"I was really too honest a man to be a politician and live." Socrates.

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2008, 11:46 PM
Martin_Doudoroff's Avatar
Martin_Doudoroff Martin_Doudoroff is offline
Charter Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 731
Martin_Doudoroff
Re: Is Print Dead?

Absolutes are tricky, but there's certainly no question that newspapers have declined precipitously in quantity. I feel they've declined precipitously in quality, too, and I'd lump the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times in there.

I'm quite worried, because it seems to me the media that are prospering are those dedicated to telling a paticular interest group what it wants to hear, rather than providing oversight on our society & government. Without a functioning "fourth branch", I really don't see this American experiment lasting much longer in any recognizable form.

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:23 AM
ChrisPerry's Avatar
ChrisPerry ChrisPerry is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 746
ChrisPerry 10
Re: Is Print Dead?

We still have a local (county) paper but they did lay off a lot of folks recently. They used to do their own printing and instead of investing $1-2million on a new press decided to sublet it and downsize.

So in this 'new media' age where will we get our news? TV? At least they have a revenue source. I often look up news on my paper's website, but if the paper folds I'd expect the website to also.

Are ANY websites making money off advertising? Or subscriptions (for news?)

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2008, 12:21 PM
Dennis_Vied's Avatar
Dennis_Vied Dennis_Vied is offline
Moderator- Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Livermore CA
Posts: 1,585
Dennis_Vied
Re: Is Print Dead?

I can see just from my own experience how this might occur. For the last several years, I've gotten the bulk of my news from World Net Daily online. We have a couple of county papers and still are fortunate to have a local city paper, the only paper I read now. It's refreshing to read a paper that actually reports the news as it is, without an attempt to influence one's opinion.

There has been a perception that the major papers have a political agenda that colors their news, and that is the reason for the decline. I'm not sure that is the case. No doubt they do have an ideological bent, but I think the decline is due to the plethora of alternative news sources.

I will probably continue to get the bulk of my news online. Your question of any websites making money is well taken. Sometimes WND issues a call for donations, so it can't be very lucrative. I can see where subscriptions might be a viable way to go.
__________________
Dennis

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2008, 11:31 PM
Ron Metz Ron Metz is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 198
Ron Metz 10
Re: Is Print Dead?

Dallas Morning News: David Leeson takes a buyout.

David Leeson Takes Buy-Out At Dallas Morning News

ALSO - some interesting statistics:

Will Newspapers Survive welcome
__________________
"I was really too honest a man to be a politician and live." Socrates.

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland


Last edited by Ron Metz; 09-08-2008 at 12:18 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2008, 01:15 PM
MathewLodge's Avatar
MathewLodge MathewLodge is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 399
MathewLodge
Re: Is Print Dead?

In my opinion, this is not a shift in public appetite for news but a business model change problem. Clearly, from the stats, people still want news. The problem is that the simple business model of using ad revenue to pay for very general editorial content with the cover charge paying for distribution is no longer working.

Advertisers want to be able to target -- it delivers a superior return if they can focus on an audience who is receptive to their message. Thus any ad-supported business is at risk from a competitor who can offer better targeting for advertisers.

There are now more targeted ad channels, and online ads continue to show particular effectiveness (just look at Google's quarterly accounts!) Thus ad rates and circulation decline for generalist newspapers, and that quickly becomes a negative reinforcement loop: lower circulation means less ad revenue, which means less editorial, which is less appealing to readers, which leads to lower circulation.

I believe what we are also seeing is a fracturing of the "general readership" into specialist categories -- which has benefits for both the readers and the advertisers. Newspapers are by nature broad and general in their coverage. Yet specialist editorial has grown considerably in the same time period: there are now thousands more magazines focused on particular areas of interest. Thus "print" is not dead: it has, in fact, gotten bigger. What has declined are generalist newspapers.

Specialist editorial newspapers have also done well -- The Economist and the Wall Street Journal, for example. In a different form of specialization in London, newspapers designed to be read by bored commuters on the train home and then discarded have flourished. I call them "casual newspapers" -- the editorial content is light: just enough for the ride home, and then they're discarded. There are now at least two to three of these on offer every workday evening outside London tube stations.

So, print is not dead -- it's just becoming more specialized.

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/photojournalism/78935-print-dead.html
Posted By For Type Date
78935 Print Dead Rapidshare Search Engine - Meta search engine - search DVD, MP3, ISO, music, video, games This thread Refback 09-02-2009 03:02 PM
Pro Photo HOME This thread Refback 11-02-2008 01:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.


ColorRight





Professional Photo Resources Atlanta

Photo Barn


Geo Visitors Map

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0