| Re: between Lumix LX2 or Canon G7? The DMC-LX2 right?
I have the 8 MP DMC-LX1 and have used it all over, shooting RAW all the way. I carry it with me most places I go.
The LX2 stuffs more pixels on the chip and allows higher ISO. But they should have addressed the noise issue instead of loading up the pixels.
From the reviews I understrand noise is the same as LX1 per ISO, roughly. If that is true, I'll stick with my LX1.
It has a lot of advantages. The cons are that it's difficult to shoot clean higher than ISO 200. ACR helps remove the noise greatly, mostly color noise, but you will have some luminence noise left. The internal flash is not the greatest and a little flimsy. There is no viewfinder, and in bright sunlight, although you can brighten the LCD, it often is not enough. Also, unlike my Canon 20D which records about 8 megabytes to card per image and is an 8MP camera, the LX1, an 8 MP camera records an 16MP file for each image. So you need a fast, large SD card. A 2GB SD will get about 105 images per card. You only have to wait 2-3 seconds for the LX1 to write to a 150x SD card though.
Esp noteworthy pros: only camera with 16:9 wide image, really nice when you get used to it. Mechanical side switch for going from auto to auto-macro to manual focus. It is just about the smallest camera that shoots RAW. The lens does stick out a little more than you'd think though. Images are really sharp, nice lens...this makes up for the noise IMO.
I used LX1 for a trip to Ireland when I couldn't bring a camera bag (pub shots). Or for when I wanted a wide aspect shot, like a waterfall or a broad seascape.
I know nothing about the G7, but I do own an old G2. I find it not small enough for really stuff away in pocket shooting, and I grew to hate the 4:3 aspect ratio when compared to the 16:9. Still I liked many things about it, mainly the swivel LCD, viewfinder and flash shoe.
Last edited by JimHayes; 12-31-2006 at 09:20 PM.
|