| Re: Canon SD 700 IS Michael
After some time with this camera, I'm beginning to enjoy it's attributes. For such a small sensor, it's amazingly sharp, with an excellent lens helping substantially. Much better than the newer iterations, according to all the reviews I could find, particularly the SD800 with the 28mm equivalent lens. While the 28mm perspective would be advantegeous, I'm not willing to forgo the native sharpness of the image, coming from high end Nikon digital equipment now and Canon previously for film. It also is very responsive, with a reasonably rapid continuous mode. That's with either the Sandisk Ultra II or Extreme III 2G SD card. And I love that continuous IS for the video mode, as well. While I do miss the ability to shoot in full manual mode, the unit's internal computer is pretty capable for most situations, and the "manual" mode available does provide some flexibility. And in spite of reviews to the contrary, I've seen reasonable battery life, although haven't fully tested that aspect as to exact number of images on a charge. As a precaution, I did pick up a spare, since there's no battery meter, as in the DSLRs and most videocams. The one accessory I did purchase and returned was the Canon leather case. It was nicely fitted, but no place for battery/SD card, and had that lousy magnetic clasp. A real pain. Replaced it with a basic Lowepro mini case with compartments for both the above. Inexpensive and well configured.
As I used to do underwater photography with Nikonos units and Ikelite flash housings, I decided to invest in the dedicated WP-DC5 underwater case. It's slick as can be, fits like a glove and very compact with reasonably light weight. I'm going to be very comfortable using it in many environmentally challenged situations besides the occasional underwater event. In the limited testing I've done so far, there seems to be no perceptible image degradation from using the case, with the exception of needing the flash diffuser at the wider settings, and the resulting decline in light output. Would likely need an external flash if doing extensive underwater work, but that's a very limited use for me these days, so really not a necessity.
All in all, a great little camera. Now we'll see how it holds up over time!
__________________ OldPhotos |