| Re: Normal Lens Reccomendations? You know, last week I met somebody who showed me copies (printed with a laser printer) he's made of very old (I'm talking about 13th-16th century) maps of Paris; the printout detail was so superb I asked what kind of lens he had used for this.
Answer: an IXUS 400 (PowerShot S400 in the U.S.) hand-held. With the lighting conditions he was dealing with (remember, these are old documents you cannot photocopy, touch or put under strong light), his choice made excellent sense: a small, light camera with depth-of-field galore. Of course, I did not believe him, and he proceeded to demonstrate by photographing his copy under a lamp (I think the light bulb was 40W), uploaded the pic, and printed it. Magic! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
Of course, handling the 50 f/1.8 is a much cheaper choice, but when using an SLR camera, you should also consider using a reproducing table to that you eliminate all factors that contribute to camera-shake (mirror lock-up, remote release, mounting), not to mention I'd rather spend the shutter life of the 10D for things other than reproductions. Just a thought... White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland |