Pro Photo HOME
Go Back   Pro Photo HOME > Professional Digital Camera Discussion - Full Access for Basic Members > Canon EOS Digital SLR with 1.6X sensors

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2003, 11:54 AM
Doug_Kerr's Avatar
Doug_Kerr Doug_Kerr is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,145
Doug_Kerr
300D - \"extra\" 1536 x 1024 px image

There has been considerable "interest" among the denizens of the DPR 300D forum over the "discovery" that the large and medium Exif JPEG (.JPG) output files, in addition to the main image and the well-known thumbnail image, also contain a third JPEG image at 1536 x 1024 px.

It appears to typically account for about 450 KB of the total file size.

Do we know the purpose of this?

Evidently this is a "feature" of the 300D not paralleling the situation on the 10D.

Best regards,

Doug Kerr

  


White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2003, 04:44 PM
Paul_Bleicher Paul_Bleicher is offline
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Paul_Bleicher 10
Embedded JPEG

Doug:

Did you see my post on the DPR forum? The embedded JPEG is very much a feature of the 10D. In fact, in the 10D you can choose the size and quality of the JPEG, while in the 300D you have no choice. The purpose is to have a JPEG available immediately, without post-processing. It takes seconds to extract 50 of them from 50 RAW files using the Canon FVU. It serves an excellent purpose, but its usefullness is limited by the lack of choice in size and quality.

Paul

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2003, 05:18 PM
Noel_Carboni's Avatar
Noel_Carboni Noel_Carboni is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 5,332
Noel_Carboni
Re: Embedded JPEG

Someone's confusing Raw and JPEG here. There is one embedded JPEG (of selectable size( in 10D Raw images. There is a thumbnail and only one full-sized JPEG in 10D JPEG images.

-Noel

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2003, 06:45 PM
Doug_Kerr's Avatar
Doug_Kerr Doug_Kerr is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,145
Doug_Kerr
Re: Embedded JPEG

Noel,

You wrote:
[ QUOTE ]
Someone's confusing Raw and JPEG here. There is one embedded JPEG (of selectable size( in 10D Raw images. There is a thumbnail and only one full-sized JPEG in 10D JPEG images.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and evidently a thumbnail and two "full-sized" JPEG images in a 300D JPG file (at least when the main image size is larger than 1536 x 1024 px), one of them (not the "main" one) of size 1536 x 1024 px).

Best regards,

Doug

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2003, 06:53 PM
Doug_Kerr's Avatar
Doug_Kerr Doug_Kerr is offline
Premium Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,145
Doug_Kerr
Re: Embedded JPEG

Paul,

You wrote:
[ QUOTE ]
Did you see my post on the DPR forum?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I can't bear to read all the traffic in those long threads - they usually go off in so many different directions! Sorry! I usually make it a point to read your stuff.

[ QUOTE ]
The purpose is to have a JPEG available immediately, without post-processing. It takes seconds to extract 50 of them from 50 RAW files using the Canon FVU. It serves an excellent purpose, but its usefullness is limited by the lack of choice in size and quality.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point, and I knew that, but I was asking about the 300D JPG files. I think you are talking about the 300D (and 10D) RAW files.

Best regards,

Doug

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2003, 12:25 AM
Paul_Bleicher Paul_Bleicher is offline
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Paul_Bleicher 10
Quit right

I was confusing Raw and JPEG. Perhaps Chuck W. can enlighten us re: the extra JPEG in the JPEG.

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2003, 03:35 PM
Paul_Bleicher Paul_Bleicher is offline
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 54
Paul_Bleicher 10
I think I figured this out

I was wandering in Staples today and saw the Canon PictBridge printer - 4 X 6 photos right from your picture. This smaller JPEG would give 256 dpi at 4 X 6 -- probably perfect for the PictBridge printer. That is why it is new.

Paul

White Balance so easy, even our 5 year old can do it.- Melissa Strickland

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


ColorRight





Professional Photo Resources Atlanta

Photo Barn


Geo Visitors Map

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0