C1 3.7 final now available for download!

FrankWerner · #1 05-12-2005, 10:41 AM

www.phaseone.com

Hope they fixed some bugs.

Guy_Mancuso · #2 05-12-2005, 11:47 AM

Well i just downloaded it and got it set but I ran into this. They have a option for single processors. On the Dell 670 workstation dual Xeon processors I have the option to choose that, than on my laptop that is grayed out. I don’t think I would want to choose that but why do they have that option. I wonder if you did than one processor is dedicated to Raw processing and the other to other tasks, interesting option and for us duallie guy’s I wonder what it means.

So the question is for folks with dual processors do we chose single or let it run on both. What peformance option would be the best. I wonder if Michael can jump in on this one. I will post this on Raw workflow also

#3 05-12-2005, 11:51 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I wonder if Michael can jump in on this one. I will post this on Raw workflow also

[/ QUOTE ]

You'd better ask him quickly. You'd also better go there and read the announcement.

Having said that, the new Styles feature might be interesting in 3.7. I have not played with it, but it's an interesting approach.

http://www.marktucker.com/temp/styles.jpg

The Mac version downloaded fine to my 17", running 10.3.9.

Guy_Mancuso · #4 05-12-2005, 12:01 PM

Wow did not realize he is leaving Phase One.

Jamie_Roberts · #5 05-12-2005, 12:07 PM

(Michael Tapes leaving CO)...and he's taken up with RSE (developers who used to work at CO)!

3.7 Windows doesn't have any of the "styles" Mark--you'll have to let us know what they are... are they just a way of globally setting a WB / hue / saturation / curve / focus? Or something else?

FrankWerner · #6 05-12-2005, 12:15 PM

Michael Tapes stopped working for/with C1 more then a month ago. There is a post on his website about this.

Just checked it out and they still didn't fixed the wrong pixel count error. I find this very annoying as you never get the 2:3 ratio when downsizing it for web. For print its not important but all my webfiles are 500x750 and since 3.6 they would be 750 by 499 or 1024 x 681 instead of 683 instead. Now I crop them always to 3:2 but that can't be a solution.

Jamie_Roberts · #7 05-12-2005, 12:26 PM

Yes, Michael stopped with CO--but the connection with RSE is brand new!

Frank--not to be stupid or abrasive or anything--but can you tell us why a couple of pixels shaved for output matters on the Web, where that kind of error is negligible anyway? Is this just a web coding problem or something?