This Subject comes up more and more with the affordability of Digital SLRs these days.
My problem with people always analyzing this is that one section of those individuals who come into a market and sell for less are not accounted for.
I started my studio 3 years ago from nothing and I mean nothing. All I had was a 10D and a couple of good L lenses. I shot anything and everything I could at next to nothing. All the while reading posts about this very subject and never posting another reason for the price undercuts.
Now 3 years later I finally have all my workflows down, a fully equipped studio and have brought all my prices into range with my competitors. I now have a very good portfolio of all different kinds of work. 90% of my work going forward is all referals as up until now I had no budget for marketing or advertisment. I lost only about 5% of my customers when I raised my prices by 60%.
Believe me I lost my butt over that time but now I am sitting with 100K worth of assets in my studio and wedding contracts for the next 9 month to keep me running even if I get no other work.
There is no way in hell I would be able to jump into a market and start a studio from scratch and demand the top $ the other studios were getting. "can I see a sample of your work?"... "Umm I have some B&W stuff I did in my darkroom at home."
I completely understand the reason for these discussions because there are a lot of rank amatuers that have no business charging people for what they call photography. I have over 25 years of avid shooting so I am not one fo those people but I did have to do the price undercutting just to get my foot in the door to a business doing what I truly love.
Rick
P.S. I deal with customers who want to go to one of those amatuers instead of me by telling them to go right ahead. I know they will not get the quality and the person will be gone within 6-9 months anyhow. I will see them again