What was this photo shot with?

[Jerry Skrocki]

MJWeb,

Embedding another photographer's photo in the forum without permission could be violating copyright law.

You were sent instructions to use your real name in the signature line of your posts. Please comply with the forum rules when posting to ProPhoto Home.

Jerry

[Noel_Carboni]

It's clearly a wide angle photo yet the depth of field is still fairly short. That implies a large sensor and an expensive (large aperture) lens.

Could this photo have been manipulated to shorten the DOF? Possibly, but it would have taken a lot of work and I don't see much of any evidence of that kind of editing. Could someone have "dumbed down" the colors to give a high quality dSLR image the look of a less expensive model (or perhaps film)? Absolutely.

-Noel

[MJWeb]

Thanks Noel,
The resolution seemed low and the color balance seemed blue to my untrained eye.
MJW

[David_Buzzard]

It's definitely a full frame dSLR camera, like a Canon 1Ds or 5D, or Nikon D3 or D700. With the focusing issues on the 1D MkIII, along with significant price rebates from Nikon, a lot of news services have adopted the D3.

It's a slight wide angle, like a 35mm or 28mm. You don't see a lot fixed length lenses on the campagne trail, so my guess would be either the 28-70mm, or 24-70mm lens, shot wide open. This really shows how great these new cameras are in low light situations.

No way at all this was shot with a point and shoot.

Digitally manipulating the DOF in a news photo would be strictly forbidden.

Maybe they'll get Obama to be the cool guy on the new Mac ads?

David Buzzard

[Noel_Carboni]

"Strictly forbidden". Heh. I don't put anything past the "tabloid" news media any more.

Why the assumption that it's a news photo? Granted it probably is.

I imagine Barack's family and friends take pictures of him too.

-Noel

[Ron Metz]

I may be off base here but regardless what camera and lens was used, the image looks like a composite. The head looks like it was placed into that image.

Jerry, lighten up.

[MathewLodge]

Originally Posted by Ron Metz

I may be off base here but regardless what camera and lens was used, the image looks like a composite. The head looks like it was placed into that image.

Yes, it does. Agree with the other comments that the Depth of Field suggests a full or large-frame camera; that and the strong contrast suggests a large aperture (expensive), short-end zoom. But the contrast could have been tweaked in post processing.

You're not going to get a definitive answer for your bet, since the image has been resized and recompressed as a PNG so there are few clues on the original.